The Professionals

What does the title of this post mean to you?

  • A crime-action TV series broadcast in the UK from 1977 to 1983 and featuring Cowley, Doyle and Bodie from the unit CI5
  • the sort of people who do bad things without getting emotional, such as Bond villains like Dr Kaufman in Tomorrow Never Dies (1997), “I’m just a professional doing a job”
  • trained, skilled and experienced members of a set of respected occupations including doctors and lawyers
  • members of a chess team who get paid to play chess.

Yes, today’s correct answer is the last of these. We turn the spotlight on professional chess players in English chess, or more precisely in the London League. But first, some context. Arguably the strongest national chess league in the world is the German Bundesliga, founded in 1980 and home to many of the world’s top players. The nearest domestic equivalent is the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), founded in 1993. This is the UK’s premier chess league competition. Many of its teams are sponsored, enabling them to bring in top players. This is expected, and no one gets worked up about it. Professionals have to make a living somehow and being paid to play for a team in a league is just one more source of income.

The London League was the strongest league in the UK before the advent of the 4NCL and remains its strongest amateur league. This happened naturally. England’s capital city is the most populated in the UK and has the largest concentration of chess players of all abilities. Most of these don’t – or can’t – make money from chess and play for enjoyment.

Then along came Wood Green. This is a chess team composed almost entirely of professionals and managed by the controversial Brian Smith, formerly Secretary of the League. Although some professionals turn out for other clubs, Wood Green are the only team that could be described as a professional team. They have won the League title for as long as anyone can remember.

A look at the latest Division 1 league table for 2022/23 makes the point. This is up to date as of today. 11 teams have between them played 39 matches out of a total of 55.

TeamPldPts%AvgMinMaxRange
Wood Green77100%24082394241824
Hammersmith86.581%217920642394330
Richmond8563%217520252319294
Hackney64.575%212120382179141
Streatham63.558%210219812186205
Cavendish53.570%22012173223764
Mushrooms7343%20281978205981
Battersea82.531%201919192155236
Athenaeum6233%199919482072124
Kings Head71.521%201718542164310
Imperial College1000%179716481907259

Wood Green are the only team to have won all their matches. They stand out as consistently higher-rated on average, at around 2400 each match. Most of the other teams are in the range 2000 to 2200. The lanterne rouge goes to Imperial College, rated just under 1800 and already certain to be relegated. The overall average is 2079.

It’s interesting to note the narrow rating range of only 24 points across 7 matches for Wood Green – much lower than for any other team. This arises from a core squad (see table below for more details) where a small number of players turn out for most matches. To be exact, 7 players out of a squad of 14 have each played in at least 5 out of 7 matches. You would expect this from a paid team. If turning out for the team is a source of income, you would naturally prioritise that over other non-paid chessplaying opportunities.

TitleNameRatingPldPts%
GMNicholas Pert2606100%
GMJon S Speelman253110.550%
GMJonathan W Rowson251075.579%
GMJohn W Emms250922100%
IMRichard G Pert24872150%
GMAlexander Cherniaev24877571%
GMNeil R McDonald246775.579%
GMBogdan Lalic24233267%
GMChris G Ward239455100%
FMDavid L Haydon237365.592%
IMGraeme N Buckley23376467%
CMPeter D Lalic227566100%
IMSusan K Lalic222422100%
Max P Pert207110.550%
Total145644.579%

The presence of one professional team in a league of amateur teams has both positive and negative points. On the positive side, the professional team is a benchmark for others to aim at. Matches against Wood Green provide an opportunity to play a GM or an IM, which is a valuable experience in itself. As long as you leave your ego out of the equation, losing (which usually happens) is manageable and you can learn a lot from the way the strongest players approach the game.

Against that, the league is not as competitive as it might be, because one team always wins and everyone else is playing for second place. This devalues the status of champions. Is a title worth having if you can buy it for money? And it’s easy to say how players / teams on the outside can resent the one team with the most resources. Compare the Premier League in English football. Many people resent Manchester City, unquestionably the strongest team of the past decade, because their financial resources have enabled them to buy many of the world’s best players. It’s not a level playing-field.

Finally, a note on payment. I don’t have any inside knowledge of the financial arrangements in operation at Wood Green. About 15 years ago, the going rate for a GM or IM in the London League was £100 a match plus expenses. That may have gone up since then with inflation. I’m assuming that what is now paid is still a flat rate rather than relating to performance. In some sports you get a bonus if you win rather than draw or lose. But in the London League, most Wood Green players win most of their games, so this is normal. I imagine the manager is prepared to take the occasional hit as long as the team gets the result – as it always does.

2 thoughts on “The Professionals

  1. Derek 2 Dym

    I was going to suggest an article on The Professionals and Chess 2 – but there is no reference to chess in the series that I can find. You’d have thought that Doyle might have played….

    Reply
  2. Rodney Barking Post author

    Thank you Derek. Chess is more likely to be played by their villainous opponent. Delivering mate would be a metaphor for executing his victims.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *